Influences of turbulence on suspension feeding by planktonic protozoa; experiments in laminar shear fields
Abstract
Laminar shear below the turbulence microscale can create relative motion between protozoan suspension feeders and their prey, potentially influencing encounter and retention. Theory suggests that ingestion rate may rise sigmoidally with increasing turbulence strength, although interference with feeding mechanisms might occur at some turbulence levels. We measured rates of feeding on fluorescently labeled prey at concentrations below feeding saturation in a survey of cultured bacterivorous and herbivorous flagellates, ciliates, and a helioflagellate over a wide range of shear rates produced in rotating Couette flows. Shears of 0.1–10 s−1 (corresponding to moderate to extremely strong marine and estuarine turbulence) enhanced clearance rates by the aloricate choanoflagellate, Monosiga sp., up to 2.7 × the mean rate in still water. Shears of 110 s−1 enhanced clearance rates by the helioflagellate, Ciliophrys marina, up to 7.0 × the mean in still water. The data are consistent with a sigmoidal response to increasing shear rate. In contrast, clearance rates of the tintinnid, Helicostomella sp., were suppressed at 10 s−1 to as low as 0.42 × the still‐water rate. Several other flagellates and ciliates (Paraphysomonas sp., two unidentified chrysomonads, Diaphanoeca grandis, Favella sp., and an unidentified heterotrich) showed no significant effects. We hypothesize that the protozoa most susceptible to an influence of turbulence are nonmotile (e.g. Heliozoa, Foraminifera, Radiolaria) or are weak swimmers (e.g. some flagellates and ciliates). Current methods for measuring feeding rates in still‐water incubations may underestimate grazing by these taxa under strong turbulence in the field. Through species‐specific influences on feeding rates, spatial and temporal variations in turbulence may have very selective effects on microbial food‐web dynamics.
Number of times cited: 31
- Teresa Serra, Aina Barcelona, Marçal Soler and Jordi Colomer, Daphnia magna filtration efficiency and mobility in laminar to turbulent flows, Science of The Total Environment, 621, (626), (2018).
- Rodrigo A. Martínez, Albert Calbet and Enric Saiz, Effects of small-scale turbulence on growth and grazing of marine microzooplankton, Aquatic Sciences, 80, 1, (2018).
- Gianluca Dell’Aquila, Maria I. Ferrante, Marco Gherardi, Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino, Maurizio Ribera d’Alcalà, Daniele Iudicone and Alberto Amato, Nutrient consumption and chain tuning in diatoms exposed to storm-like turbulence, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-017-02084-6, 7, 1, (2017).
- Alberto Amato, Stefania Fortini, Romain Watteaux, Marcello Diano, Stefania Espa, Serena Esposito, Maria I. Ferrante, Francesc Peters, Daniele Iudicone and Maurizio Ribera d’Alcalà, TURBOGEN: Computer-controlled vertically oscillating grid system for small-scale turbulence studies on plankton, Review of Scientific Instruments, 87, 3, (035119), (2016).
- Ute Risse-Buhl, Katja Felsmann and Michael Mutz, Colonization dynamics of ciliate morphotypes modified by shifting sandy sediments, European Journal of Protistology, 50, 4, (345), (2014).
- FL Schaafsma and L Peperzak, Phytoplankton growth inhibited by the toxic and bacterivorous ciliate Uronema marinum (Protozoa, Ciliophora), Marine Ecology Progress Series, 475, (35), (2013).
- John R. Dolan, David J. S. Montagnes, Sabine Agatha, D. Wayne Coats and Diane K. Stoecker, References, The Biology and Ecology of Tintinnid Ciliates, (244-287), (2012).
- Jennifer C. Prairie, Kelly R. Sutherland, Kerry J. Nickols and Amanda M. Kaltenberg, Biophysical interactions in the plankton: A cross‐scale review, Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments, 2, 1, (121-145), (2012).
- I. R. Jenkinson and J. Sun, A model of pycnocline thickness modified by the rheological properties of phytoplankton exopolymeric substances, Journal of Plankton Research, 33, 3, (373), (2011).
- Thomas Kiørboe, How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade‐offs, Biological Reviews, 86, 2, (311-339), (2011).
- J. Planella Morato, E. Roget and I. Lozovatsky, Statistics of microstructure patchiness in a stratified lake, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 116, C10, (2011).
- EM Maldonado and MI Latz, Species-specific effects of fluid shear on grazing by sea urchin larvae: comparison of experimental results with encounter-model predictions, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 436, (119), (2011).
- K. Rokkan Iversen, R. Primicerio, A. Larsen, J. K. Egge, F. Peters, O. Guadayol, A. Jacobsen, H. Havskum and C. Marrase, Effects of small-scale turbulence on lower trophic levels under different nutrient conditions, Journal of Plankton Research, 32, 2, (197), (2010).
- Peter A. Jumars, John H. Trowbridge, Emmanuel Boss and Lee Karp‐Boss, Turbulence‐plankton interactions: a new cartoon, Marine Ecology, 30, 2, (133-150), (2009).
- MAGDALENA M. MUSIELAK, LEE KARP-BOSS, PETER A. JUMARS and LISA J. FAUCI, Nutrient transport and acquisition by diatom chains in a moving fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 638, (401), (2009).
- D.M. Lewis and S.I. Bala, Plankton predation rates in turbulence: A study of the limitations imposed on a predator with a non-spherical field of sensory perception, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242, 1, (44), (2006).
- Diane K. Stoecker, Amy Long, Steven E. Suttles and Lawrence P. Sanford, Effect of small-scale shear on grazing and growth of the dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida, Harmful Algae, 5, 4, (407), (2006).
- Marcianna Ptak Delaney and Roy Knoechel, Turbulence effects on cold ocean microbial communities: an enclosure study, Journal of Marine Systems, 49, 1-4, (123), (2004).
- A. Malits, F. Peters, M. Bayer–Giraldi, C. Marrasé, A. Zoppini, O. Guadayol and M. Alcaraz, Effects of Small-Scale Turbulence on Bacteria: A Matter of Size, Microbial Ecology, 48, 3, (287), (2004).
- Antje Rusch, Markus Huettel, Clare E Reimers, Gary L Taghon and Charlotte M Fuller, Activity and distribution of bacterial populations in Middle Atlantic Bight shelf sands, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 44, 1, (89-100), (2006).
- Harry Havskum, Effects of small-scale turbulence on interactions between the heterotrophic dinoflagellateOxyrrhis marinaand its prey,Isochrysissp., Ophelia, 57, 3, (125), (2003).
- Lynn A. Leonard, P. Ansley Wren and Rebecca L. Beavers, Flow dynamics and sedimentation in Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis marshes of the Chesapeake Bay, Wetlands, 22, 2, (415), (2002).
- Benjamin L. Preston, Terry W. Snell, David M. Fields and Marc J. Weissburg, The effects of fluid motion on toxicant sensitivity of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, Aquatic Toxicology, 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00140-5, 52, 2, (117-131), (2001).
- D.M. LEWIS and T.J. PEDLEY, The Influence of Turbulence on Plankton Predation Strategies, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 210, 3, (347), (2001).
- M. C. Bujan-Nunez and B. Vazquez-Varela, Brownian dynamics simulation of linear chain growth, Molecular Physics, 98, 15, (1011), (2000).
- Vladimir M Kushnir, Turbulent diffusion in the near-bottom boundary layer of the Black Sea shelf zone, Journal of Marine Systems, 21, 1-4, (243), (1999).
- J.‐M. André, C. Navarette, J. Blanchot and M.‐H. Radenac, Picophytoplankton dynamics in the equatorial Pacific: Growth and grazing rates from cytometric counts, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104, C2, (3369-3380), (1999).
- Darcy J Lonsdale, Melissa A Frey and Terry W Snell, The role of chemical signals in copepod reproduction, Journal of Marine Systems, 15, 1-4, (1), (1998).
- John F. Dower, Thomas J. Miller and William C. Leggett, The Role of Microscale Turbulence in the Feeding Ecology of Larval Fish, Advances in Marine Biology Volume 31, 10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60223-0, (169-220), (1997).
- Teresa Serra, Jordi Colomer and Xavier Casamitjana, Aggregation and Breakup of Particles in a Shear Flow, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 187, 2, (466), (1997).
- M. A. R. Koehl, WHEN DOES MORPHOLOGY MATTER?, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 1, (501), (1996).





